The DNR issued a scientific collection permit to Mysore in 2014 that allows for the collection of wildlife for scientific or educational purposes but becomes void with proof that the permittee killed any wildlife. Documents obtained by PETA reveal that Johns Hopkins experimenter Shreesh Mysore cuts into the skulls of barn owls, inserts electrodes into their brains, forces them to look at screens for hours a day, and bombards them with noises and lightsand pretends that doing this will tell us something about attention-deficit disorder in humans. They need to be protected, not experimented on. But cutting into the skulls of owls and bombarding them with lights and sounds for several hours at a time doesnt help anyonehumans or other animals. Scan this QR code to download the app now. Johns Hopkins has refused to end the use of owls in cruel brain tests. Call the university's president. Mysorewho from 2015 to 2018 failed to obtain mandatory permits to possess barn owls legally for use in his experiments and who admitted in his federal funding application his plan to kill the owls, even though doing so would void his legally required Scientific Collecting permitshas received more than $1.9 million in taxpayer money from NIH to mutilate owls brains. NIH must immediately cut funding for JHUs experiments on owls or risk being complicit in the blatant corruption of science and the law. Theres no dispute that JHU broke the law by conducting these tests for four years without having mandatory state permitsand taxpayers have been footing the bill to the tune of $1.9 million. PETA is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation. So weve reiterated our demand that NIH stop letting animal experimenters break the law without consequences. JHU is also falsely claiming that experiments, which have resulted in no benefits to a single human, are important to the understanding of human autism, schizophrenia, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderalmost throwing in the common coldeven though psychiatrists, neuroscientists, and people with common sense are saying that they absolutely are not. The university has applied for and received a permit to possess barn owls for scientific purposes, which is the appropriate permit for their captive-bred animals, Gregg Bortz, the DNRS media relations manager, said last month. 1. BUT. By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. PETA is waging a campaign to end these cruel and deadly experimentsand you can help. {reads the article} I feel bad for the barn owls, to be sure. I don't know what Johns Hopkins does or does not do but you can't trust PETA. Earlier this month, PETA complained to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MD DNR) that the permit that the agency had issued to JHU experimenter Shreesh Mysore allowed him to kill owls after using them in invasive brain tests (see details below), pointing out that state law strictly forbids this practice. Johns Hopkins Owl Experimenter Admits His Own Testing is Flawed - YouTube 0:00 / 1:05 #PETA Johns Hopkins Owl Experimenter Admits His Own Testing is Flawed 148,860 views Sep 29, 2020 3.4K. The permits must be renewed annually. PETA shifted its focus to a permit needed for using animals in scientific experiments. Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mail unless you explicitly opt out by clicking, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, cuts into the skulls of barn owls, inserts electrodes into their brains, forces them to look at screens for hours a day, and bombards them with noises and lights.
Glucerna Samples For Healthcare Professionals,
What Type Of Cancer Did Jackie Peterson Have,
Is Canada Allowing Cruise Ships In 2022,
What Factors Affect Future Planning In An Organization,
Opengate Capital Lawsuit,
Articles J
