I honestly dont have the desire to find out anything more about co-workers than what they tell me. This is still horrifying from a user perspective, but its not really relevant to the current discussion about private individuals searching public social media. It still angers me irrationally because of how over the top it is. The issue comes when your manager has strong opinions about how you should do things that dont match up with reality, and think you have some hidden agenda for having the opinions you do. I just think that you did something stupid so I will take advantage of it to satisfy my own curiosity isnt the hill I would want to die on.). But the restructure itself may well have been an attempt to respond to her concerns. Im guessing I work for the same company. If youre in a place that isnt locked down/password protected but also isnt heavily trafficked, its similar to being in your house with the curtains open on your window. If only we could donate all of our swag to teachers and schools that need it. To continue with your analogy, I think think asking the person wearing the costume would be the same as asking a coworker directly about certain information. Or at least, neutral knowledge that would be weird if it slipped out. Did she really think only people in her survivors group would find it and read it? I dont know, I think that there can be times when youre a normal level of curious about another person but there isnt a good time/reason to ask them to go into it. Im in a job with some pretty hefty commute times, so a lot of us dont live in the city where the job is. And benevolent acquaintances do not do that kind of intensive search, so if you are doing it, I have to assume that you have some malicious interest in doing so. And in those cases, these were all public before the internet: newpaper articles, magazine articles, county records, even name and address. Even if right now info that is collected is aggregated at some point in the future it can become public (like usenet) or all it could take is a single hacker who is good enough to get access to all that info. I assume theyre doing the same to me. If your coworkers are snooping into your professional or personal life, take action to stop the bad behavior. A lot of people leave their jobs because theyre being underpaid it doesnt make sense for employers to base their pay on that information. I love this idea! So if I want to do a crazy dance in a cow costume in my bedroom with the blinds open I imagine that someone is looking and maybe even recording me. Thats purposeful. Like if I found out they had a restraining order against them or multiple arrests or something. Why would a hiring mgr want a new employee to be underpaid? She was a VP and I was a director with a large team but she wasnt very effective and they thought these would help her, they didnt. I think that most people, if they are being honest with themselves, know when they have crossed from this is publicly available and fine to read to this is publicly available but maybe not great to read. #1 My stance is, if youve published it on the internet, its fair game. Snooping Coworkers- And What You Can Do About It - Warrior Lodge Media The amount of rigid, all-or-nothing thinking in this comment section is frustrating (not the person Im responding to specifically, but in general). As an example, weve got companies harvesting arrest data and putting it online to extort the people shown.
Missing Child Atlanta Ga,
Rob Jeffreys Idoc Email Address,
Wiley X Replacement Temples,
Articles C
